|
Privatization or Liquidation?
With all the seminars, speeches
and articles on privatization and its role in reviving the economy, one can
argue that Lebanon is already “privatized” by taking a look at the workings of
the parliament, government and definitely the pubic utilities sector.
The fuel market, for example, is controlled by a handful of companies (refer to
Ii Monthly Issue 0 for details), the mobile phone sector by two companies, while
Electricite du Liban is run by concessions in Jbeil, Aley and Zahle, in addition
to more than 30% of the Lebanese public who refuse to pay their electric bills.
Private health and education institutions are not only free to charge what they
like, but are also supported by the public sector through tuition and health
allowances to employees to the tune of $550 million annually. Government
donations through the Ministry of Social Affairs can also be considered
“privatized” since they are restricted to confessional and politically linked
NGOs which receive more than $50 million annually.
As for the cellular operations dilemma, two companies monopolized the mobile
phone sector through a non-transparent contract approved by the same interests
that had this contract cancelled when it began to benefit the state. Those
interests are now insisting on a course that is mostly beneficial to them - a
20-year lease. We cancelled the contracts not to “privatize” the sector, since
it was already privatized, but to liquidate it. Yes, Lebanon is pursuing a
course of liquidation and not privatization.
There seems to be a consensus by the ‘international community,’ the Lebanese
government and the majority of the parliament on privatization. Those opposed to
this path have approached the subject from an ideological perspective, stressing
the role of the state in achieving social justice and preventing the control of
public resources from being in the hands of a few.
But the issue is not about numbers, efficiency or ideology. It is about public
morality. Can the country embark on a privatization course with the politicians
having vested interests in it?
It is time that politicians abide by the Illicit Wealth Law and liquidate their
INTERESTS in public utilities, instead of liquidating THEM. Only then can we
debate the merits and plan the phases of efficient and fair privatization. The
World Bank and the IMF would do well to give this advice to Lebanon’s decision
makers.
Jawad Adra Managing Partner
|
|
Current Statistics
Stolen cars
• 1,373 cars were stolen in the year 2001 and 249 were recovered.
Passport office
• 403,464 new passports were issued between 2001-2002 and 188,256 were renewed for the same period.
Motor vehicle inspection
• 847,000 private cars had their registrations (mecanique) renewed from January - October 2002.
CDR expenses
• $844 million in expenditures are estimated for the Council of Development and Reconstruc- tions’ 2003 budget, with $536 million in external funding.
Loans
• $80 million is the amount of a World Bank loan to Lebanese municipalities in the year 2000 for infrastructure works. Since that time, only 10% ($8 million) has been disbursed.
Artisana
• LL 500 million was the government’s contribution to the Artisana in the year 2002.
Debt service
• LL 4,622 billion was the cost of the debt service in 2002, of which LL 411 billion was paid in December.
|